Are we measuring how many read over or rode over the newspaper?

| | Comments (1)

Sometimes the react is better than the first act.

Mathew Ingram and Steve Yelvington have good posts on British newspaper consultant John Duncan Webster's Dictionary of Audience Exaggeration: How internet metrics promote the myth of the dying newspaper.

Yelvington has several nuggets, but this one I can't pass up quoting:

However, the notion that a newspaper's daily print sales figures should be multiplied by some factor to derive actual readers is wishful-thinking crap, and especially so in markets where the newspaper is home delivered, such as is typical in the United States. Try dividing! Once again, I ran over this morning's paper with my car on my way to work.

Tags: | |

Categories

,

1 Comments

newscoma said:

In rural media, the "shopper" format is dying horribly as well. I had a conversation about this yesterday. And subscriptions are down, but I think that is as much that our local population has decreased due to job loss from closed/outsourced manufacturing jobs.
Needless to say, I'm a bit overwhelmed by it all.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jack D. Lail published on June 23, 2007 10:41 AM.

North Mississippi musings was the previous entry in this blog.

Teens make better readers for newspapers is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.2rc3-en