Not only are Web audiences interested almost entirely in short-form video, but they want them even shorter than they are right now.
On average, Jeremy says, Web users are selecting 4-minute videos. But they're bailing out after streaming just two minutes.
Tell it in 2 minutes
Jeremy Allaire of Brightcove, an Internet TV service, to Insider on video length:
Related Entries
- Aug 28 2009Do you believe in the "sanity clause?"0
- Aug 24 2009Credential Crud continues; victims fighting back1
- Aug 19 2009SEC Media Policy = #FAIL0
- Aug 18 2009SEC finds X's and O's of Social Media not as easy to learn as in football1
- Aug 17 2009Soon they'll be tailgating Tweet Parties0
- Aug 17 2009SEC Media Policy doesn't get better with study0
- Aug 14 2009The SEC's troubling approach to news on the Internet0
- Aug 13 2009What the SEC needs is a good coach controversy0
- Aug 12 2009Send in the tsarina to make a play0
- Aug 9 2009React to the SEC's new media policies (or hand over that cell phone)0
When I was involved in doing video for ajc.com, and tracking the length of time people watched our videos, I found that about 98 percent of the time they only watched for about 30 sec. Sports columnists, however, would sometimes be watched for up to 4 minutes. And viewers were willing to watch looong videos of the Coretta Scott King funeral.
Ninety-eight percent drop out after 30 seconds. Amazing!
I wish I had a better handle on what viewers are willing to watch -- and see to the finish. I don't have any data on how long a user stays with a video. I do know what videos are most popular on our site and which of ours are most popular on YouTube. That varies.
The basic standup piece you might see on during a TV newscast doesn't seem to work. Compelling two-minute story telling in video is a tough thing to learn for print-stained wretches, too!