Watch for it

Dick Tracy WatchOne of the delightful things about innovation and technology changes is seeing the unintended impacts. While delightful to find, they are vexing to predict.

This is not a particularly new one, but I noticed it in an article today at SignOnSanDiego:

Wristwatch sales have slowed - down 25 percent for Timex between 2003 and 2005 - as teens and young adults tell time by their phones.
The effect on landline phones, the rise of text messaging, and even to some extend, the impact on cameras were all foreseen as cell phones became ubiquitous and feature-laden models became cheap.

But who predicted watch sales wouldn't keep on ticking apace?

What was predicted turned out backwards. In the 1940s, the comic strip Dick Tracy had the detective talking into a wristwatch -- not telling time on a phone.

Innovations -- large and small -- produce unintended, or unplanned, side effects.

A small example. Being a math-challenged journalist makes a calculator a handy tool. I couldn't find one today in desk if I had to. It's buried deep in some drawer. Google's search box makes it dead simple to do 6,853 / 17 = 403.117647 without one.

Has Google hurt the calculator business ... well, yes, at least by one customer. Yet, no one I recall envisioned "search' as a replacement for the calculator.

Identifying early these unplanned side effects is where opportunity lies. It takes a sort of peripheral thinking to see them and it's a talent I haven't developed.

Have you? Do you see examples of social and use patterns changing in an unplanned way? I'd love some more examples or tips on how to spot them?

(via Steve Rubel)

Related Entries

1 Comment

About three years ago, I was in a long ass meeting, wondering what time it was, but I didn't want to be rude and look at my watch. The idea struck me -- check my Treo like I got a message ... and I knew what time it was.

Insight!

Shortly after that, I would occasionally leave my watch at home.

That occasionally has now pretty much become always.

I'm not saying I won't ever wear a watch again, or that I won't buy more watches. A good time piece, after all is a handsome accessory.

But on a day-to-day basis, who needs a watch?

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

  • DIY blueprint: Creating a media venture in a weekend

    Great behind-the-scenes piece from search engine expert Danny Sullivan on the launch of laid-off newspaperman Greg Hernandez's Greg in Hollywood blog.Basically a tool-kit for doing...

  • Carl Malamud for Public Printer of the U.S.

    I can't think of anyone more qualified in the Digital Age to be the government's head printer than Carl Malamud.Find out about his campaign to...

  • Journalism is not a federal earmark

    Dave Winer, a guy who loves news and, who among his many pioneering achievements, put the New York Times into RSS, says the newsroom curmudgeons...

  • Records behind bars

    SPJ has joined an open records battle in Tennessee. INDIANAPOLIS - The Society of Professional Journalists has joined an amicus brief written by the Tennessee...

  • Reading is fundamental

    Read The Bill from Sunlight Foundation on Vimeo.It's not a novel, but it would be novel to read legislation before it's voted on. There's...

Activity Stream

  • Jack D. Lail tweeted, "[ Reader] Would You Pay to Read This Story? - The Daily Beast: Shared by jack Yet another take on pay m.. http://tinyurl.com/df9jzo"
  • Jack D. Lail shared Would You Pay to Read This Story? - The Daily Beast from www.thedailybeast.com
  • Jack D. Lail tweeted, "@RobRichards I caught up with the Daily Show piece on CNBC. He nailed them. They are parodies of themselves."
  • Jack D. Lail tweeted, "CNBC seems reactionary shrill. Declares stimulus a bust. It's barely started. Did somebody sit on their bonus?"
  • Jack D. Lail tweeted, "Houston and San Antonio newspapers might merge? http://tinyurl.com/addrnc (via @FrankStrovel)"
More ...
Close