It seems like the attitude of TV stations towards the web, according to the article, is the same type of attitude that has sunk newspapers to the level they're at today. We've both got to get to the bottom of these insecurities and turn them upside downThere's more.
Who sucks worse: Newspapers or TV Stations?
Commenting on a Broadcasting & Cable piece on the Web and TV stations, Angela Grant says:
Related Entries
- Oct 31 2009Hauling a tool chest of ideas back from Missouri0
- Oct 23 2009Newsroom cuts hurt economic health of newspapers0
- Oct 22 2009Of “net neanderthals” and Google promiscuity0
- Oct 3 2009Lessons from the Rocky0
- Aug 28 2009Do you believe in the "sanity clause?"0
- Aug 24 2009Credential Crud continues; victims fighting back1
- Aug 19 2009SEC Media Policy = #FAIL0
- Aug 19 2009Lean and mean, newspapers now positioned to rebuild1
- Aug 18 2009SEC finds X's and O's of Social Media not as easy to learn as in football1
- Aug 17 2009Soon they'll be tailgating Tweet Parties0
Interesting. It's always been fascinating to me that TV stations are the pioneers of "electronic" media yet are so far behind on adopting websites.
Props to KNS for being out ahead of the curve for newspapers.
Locally, WATE and WBIR both seem to be catching on.
Thanks for the kind words and yes, our TV competitors are not asleep.