- Those who visit newspaper Web sites are more likely to have household incomes greater than $100,000, when compared to people who visit other sites online. Those who visit newspaper Web sites are also more likely to be in professional/managerial positions.
- Newspaper Web site visitors are significantly more likely to seek out political/campaign information online.
- Those who visit newspaper Web sites are more likely to be online shoppers, especially for travel and vehicles.
The Lake Wobegon audience
Nielsen's @Plan:
Related Entries
- May 4 2011I Walk Like An Egyptian0
- Apr 15 2011Did you notice we just passed into the 'post-PC era'?0
- Apr 14 2011I used to be read the Sunday paper; then I got an iPad0
- Mar 15 2011I bet you first saw this online0
- Feb 25 2011There is life after a newspaper's death; sometimes a better one1
- Feb 21 2011Clark Gilbert and the 'Inscrutable Dilemma'0
- Jan 30 2011Plan now for the next national breaking news story in your community0
- Nov 28 2010Paid content on iPads: Mistaking a rerun for a 'do over'2
- Oct 7 2010Back in the day when type was hot0
- Sep 28 2010Arbiters of our future0



ShareThis
Which really explains Billie, right?
I wonder how these stats compare with the folks posting comments to newspaper Web sites. I can't imagine folks in middle to upper management posting the kind of tripe most sites collect on a daily basis.
But maybe I'm giving the audience too much credit! :)
Ah, Billie. I try to keep most of my writing to half an apple. And I've gotten so good at it that over the years I've progressed from writing newspaper articles to saying in all in Twitter.
Bu as Billie says:
I like to write articles for the newpaper to practice my writing better. i have to write to the sounds of chewing sounds to get the rythum of the words inside my head. That is about the peanusts butter. It makes a different kind of sticky chew than a bannanans or sloppy dogsnuts.
http://www.knoxnews.com/users/Billie/comments/
Billie is better than the average commenter!
Patrick, you might be mistaking income and employment status with intelligence. Dilbert wouldn't agree.
http://www.dilbert.com/