The consumer value of a social-status service like Twitter resembles the value of "news" as a service. It is incidentally important, but not always important, and never all important to any one person. The intervals between incidents that you or I might deem important defy any prediction.
Does that mean we in local media should hope Twitter finds a great business model to capitalize on its traffic, since it so resembles ours? Hmm. Maybe. I find it easier (though not completely easy) to connect those dots than the ones between us and, say, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple or eBay.
The funny thing about growth curves
Jay Small has a smart take on the similarity of Twitter's audience retention woes and those of local news sites:
Related Entries
- Nov 11 2009Scripps Twitter list0
- Aug 14 2009Blame it on Twitter0
- Aug 5 2009Punk cabaret0
- Aug 5 2009A Twitter success tale that doesn't involve a get rich quick pitch0
- Aug 3 2009Social media guides for journalists0
- Jun 11 2009The year that Twitter went to #Bonnaroo0
- May 27 2009Just for the record2
- May 26 2009Fish where the fish are1
- May 13 2009Do you get Twitter now?0
Leave a comment