The debate over anonymous commenters on the Internet got amped Nov. 29 when Julie Zhuo, product design manager at Facebook, threw her hat into the ring with an Op-Ed piece in the New York Times challenging content providers to discourage or ban anonymous posters.
But the law by itself cannot do enough to disarm the Internet’s trolls. Content providers, social networking platforms and community sites must also do their part by rethinking the systems they have in place for user commentary so as to discourage — or disallow — anonymity. Reuters, for example, announced that it would start to block anonymous comments and require users to register with their names and e-mail addresses in an effort to curb “uncivil behavior.”
That has sparked a new round of public discussion about anonymous commenters and comment management. I added links to several posts reacting to Zhuo’s piece to my ever-growing Delicious tag “comments.” The latest 25 I’ve tagged are below, but you can explore more on the debate about online comments, particularly on the sites of news organizations, by browsing through the whole list.
Her voice is one of an increasing number of people asking for more civility on Internet and who see the value of limiting anonymous speech as one of the ways of getting that. News organizations, whose editors and reporters in general have never been fond of the terrain beyond the last word of the article, are embracing the cause by exploring and experimenting with solutions.
At my employer, E.W. Scripps, there is a corporate-wide committee studying what others are doing and what solutions look promising to improve the quality of discourse on our sites without stifling debate. We’ve looked at vendor solutions, technology solutions and experiments like those Rob Curley is trying at the Las Vegas Sun to have verified real name commenters as well as a less prominent or permanent place for anonymous comments.
At the News Sentinel, we have spent over a year trying to better moderate and manage comments on knoxnews and govolsxtra by involving more people in the newsroom in comment management (reviewing comments is not relegated to just a couple people) and by making some technology changes. While I’m sure some will disagree, I think the quality of the conversation has improved since we had an APME Online Credibility Roundtable on online comments.
But we still have trolls and hateful comments and flame wars.
As the quality has improved, we’ve also seen less conversation. The number of comments on our sites were down 17 percent last month from a year ago while the number of unique visits were up by over 20 percent. That means more people using our sites equals less conversation. Multiple factors, I’m sure, are at work in that equation, but I suspect the stronger approaches we’re taking have had a dampening effect on comments. Is that the desired result?
Based on level of activity we’ve seen, evaluating website comments with an eye toward improving them has a high profile at many other media organizations. I hope you find this list of links helpful in thinking about anonymity, civility of conversation and healthy discourse online. If you have suggestions for links to pieces I don’t have, please suggest them. And if you have a success story with online comments or online community management, by all means, share it.
More recent links added:
- Also We Don’t Wash | Corrente
- Simple Justice: Online Accountability Picks Up Steam
- Trolling, toxic talk and the challenges of transparency | Crisisblogger
- I hope to one day live in a world without trolls â€” Tech for the Rest of Us â€” Orlando Sentinel
- Someone On The Internet Was Mean To Me – TalkLeft: The Politics Of Crime
- Balloon Juice » Blog Archive » Getting Anonymity Wrong, As Usual
- Under the Bridge: The Side Benefits of Troll Culture | The Awl
- Don’t Feed the Trolls. No, Wait! Feed the Trolls. | The Atlantic Wire
- Obvious troll is obvious | Voltage Gate
- The scourge of trolling (not in the bars but online) « JimmyCsays
- DREAM ACT – TEXAS: Oh Those Nasty Comments
- The Feisty Liberal: Taking a Cue from Ghandi: If I Expect Civil Political Discourse from Others, I Must First Practice It Myself
- Anonymous Rex, Ctd. « Agnostic, Maybe
- Portland Press Herald Drops Reader Comments in Response to â€˜Vicious Postings’ | Poynter.
- Are the Anonymous Comments the Bane of Online News? | SixEstate Communications and Newsblogging
- Why I Like Anonymous Comments. Mostly. – Dallas News – Unfair Park
- Are the days of the anonymous cyber commenters over?
- Should Content Providers Stop Allowing Anonymous Comments? | WebProNews
- Online, Anonymity Breeds Contempt – NYTimes.com
- Internet snipers can’t hide behind free speech to justify vile comments | pressconnects.com | Press
- How Journalists’ Personal Brands Enhance Community Engagement at Brand Me a Journalist
- Facebook to Update Commenting System with Votes and More [REPORT]
- Racist messages pose quandary for mainstream sites » Knoxville News Sentinel
- In Response | Banning unsigned online comments undermines the media’s role as a forum for debate
- In Response: Banning unsigned online comments undermines the media’s role as a forum for debate | American Journalism Review