A handy newspaper stock scorecard for the year.
Continuing a theme from a Sunday post, here’s some more views on how journalists might be compensated in a digital world where every click is a metric:
Patrick Beeson: “I’m not sure dangling CPM as a sole means for earning a paycheck would be appropriate at this point however. Though it would be interesting to use it as a metric for bonuses or raises.” (See comments from Mindy McAdams, Ryan Berg …)
Lucas Grindley: “But I have long supported a bonus structure based on the number of page views generated by a reporter’s or columnist’s stories. … A page view bonus structure favors neither quantity or quality more. Sometimes cranking out posts creates the most page views, and sometimes writing one really good post can do the same.” (See comments: Mark Evans, Tish Grier, Jeremy Wright …)
Yoni Greenbaum sees some value in at least enlightening writers about what is read: “I think it’s important for desk editors and reporters to understand the habits of their online readers. Desk editors should know what stories play best online; this is not to say that you don’t report some stories, but editors should understand of what plays best and where.”
Katie Allison Granju: “We online scribes live or die by our ad impressions.”
My favorite list of Top 10 stories for 2007. East Tennessee is certainly a contender for the title of “Home of the Weird Story.”
When people need answers, most turn to the Internet, but don’t turn out the lights at the public library. Eighteen to 29-year-olds, known of Gen Y’ers, are the heaviest users of libraries for problem solving information, says a new Pew Internet and American Life study released Sunday.
I hadn’t really thought of the library as a youth haunt, but Gen Y respondents were startlingly far more likely to go to a library to solve a problem than the next group up, Gen Xers, those who are 30 to 41 years old.
Course, they could be going for free access to computers.- about 70 percent said they used a computer at the library.
We’re not talking the homeless or just people on the slow end of the digital divide. The study says::
While libraries have worked to become the place to go for those who cannot afford a computer or an internet connection, people with high access are equally likely to turn to libraries for government information as those with low access. Instead of the internet making libraries less relevant, internet use seems to create an information hunger that libraries help satisfy.
The study surveyed people about 10 problems they might have had in the past two years and how they gathered information about those problems.
The problems were:
- dealing with a serious illness or health concern;
- making a decision about school enrollment, financingschool, or upgrading work skills;
- dealing with a tax matter;
- changing a job or starting a business;
- getting information about Medicare, Medicaid, or food stamps;
- getting information about Social Security or military benefits;
- getting information about voter registration or a government policy;
- seeking helping on a local government matter such as a traffic problem or schools;
- becoming involved in a legal matter; and
- becoming a citizen or helping another person with an immigration matter.
The study was funded with a grant from a federal agency that supports libraries.
Somewhere, Ben Franklin is smiling.