Five Ws from the Barack Obama campaign

Obama textThere's been a lot written about the lessons of President-elect Barack Obama's "Triple O" Internet campaign for marketers, but little on lessons for media and journalists.

But that's about to change because the Carnival of Journalism is rolling into November with that topic in its big tent. All of this month's carnival posts are linked from sideshow barker Adam Timworth's blog.

Did Obama win because he had an iPhone app as the Geek Cowboy facetiously asked? No, but the combination of strategies used by his Internet team, dubbed "Triple O," is as likely to change national politics as fireside chats during World War II and television debates in the 1960s, some say.

I noticed five Web 2.0 strategies (we can still use that term, right) that the campaign of  Obama executed or exploited better than most news media do -- and none of are new discoveries from the wilds of the Web. "They've taken all our stupid ideas and made them smart," Zephyr Teachout, who ran Howard Dean's online organizing in 2004, told Salon.

Here's my five Ws for Web 2.0 or social media journalism from the Obama campaign:

1) Mobile text and email strategy: The campaign built a formible opt-in SMS text database (its size seems to be a closely guarded secret) and had a sophisticated email marketing strategy around 10 million e-mail addresses that adjusted the times emails were sent to times the recipients typically opened emails. It had a mobile site and a free iPhone app. It's text messages, geocoed to area code, often included the viral suggestion of "please fwd this message." You may remember that he announced his VP choice of Joe Biden by SMS about 3 million phone numbers, but what worked was thousnda of register to vote and get out the vote texts. Are you aggresively growing your SMS and email databases?

2) YouTube and video: The Obama campaign poured more resources video than any presidential campaign. He will become the first president to put his Saturday addresses on YouTube. They were still doing radio addressess only in 2008? Remember, YouTube did not exist in 2004. By 2008, Musician will.i.am's independent video in support of Obama "Yes We Can" has been seen more than 15 million times. Nearly 2,000 videos have been uploaded by the campaign to YouTube. Are you saying "Yes We Can" to YouTube as a video platform?

3) Effectively using customer databases: If you work for a U.S. media company, Barack Obama's campaign database wizards likely know more about your readers or viewers than the editor or the news director. They're likely to know if someone in your market is a reader or viewer. They know where many vote, what their phone number is, how they are likely to vote and how often they've accessed the campaign's social networking site, if ever, My.BarackObama.com. They know how many children there are in the family and what magazines and catalogs you get or cable news shows you watch. Despite heaps of data and study after study, is your news organization effectively using any demographic data to better serve and to tap new readers or viewers? Be honest!

4) Be where the users are: The Obama campaign were following about 130,000 people on Twitter and had nearly that many following its Tweets. The campaign has profiles Facebook, MySpace, flickr and as many as 16 sites. How many social networks is your news oragnizaiton on and has it done anything with them since signing up?

5) Enable the community. The Obama online campaign was focused at using online tools to get offline results, get people to volunteer to man a phone bank or go door-to-door or show up at an event. Are you using online media to mobilize your content consumers in either online or offline ways?

Some links that I found interesting while researching this post:


Links collected with Publish2 Photo by Cazimiro, used under Creative Commons terms.

Related Entries

1 Comment

Adding to your commentary, Jack, I'd like to add it's crucial that a brand (whether a company or a person) not merely "enable the community" and "be where the users are" but listen and participate with them.

Until marketing can be changed from one-way pushing of content to two-way exchanging of ideas, none of the Ws will make a difference.

Thanks for the link, Jack.

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

  • DIY blueprint: Creating a media venture in a weekend

    Great behind-the-scenes piece from search engine expert Danny Sullivan on the launch of laid-off newspaperman Greg Hernandez's Greg in Hollywood blog.Basically a tool-kit for doing...

  • Carl Malamud for Public Printer of the U.S.

    I can't think of anyone more qualified in the Digital Age to be the government's head printer than Carl Malamud.Find out about his campaign to...

  • Journalism is not a federal earmark

    Dave Winer, a guy who loves news and, who among his many pioneering achievements, put the New York Times into RSS, says the newsroom curmudgeons...

  • Records behind bars

    SPJ has joined an open records battle in Tennessee. INDIANAPOLIS - The Society of Professional Journalists has joined an amicus brief written by the Tennessee...

  • Reading is fundamental

    Read The Bill from Sunlight Foundation on Vimeo.It's not a novel, but it would be novel to read legislation before it's voted on. There's...

Activity Stream

  • Jack D. Lail tweeted, "[ Reader] Would You Pay to Read This Story? - The Daily Beast: Shared by jack Yet another take on pay m.. http://tinyurl.com/df9jzo"
  • Jack D. Lail shared Would You Pay to Read This Story? - The Daily Beast from www.thedailybeast.com
  • Jack D. Lail tweeted, "@RobRichards I caught up with the Daily Show piece on CNBC. He nailed them. They are parodies of themselves."
  • Jack D. Lail tweeted, "CNBC seems reactionary shrill. Declares stimulus a bust. It's barely started. Did somebody sit on their bonus?"
  • Jack D. Lail tweeted, "Houston and San Antonio newspapers might merge? http://tinyurl.com/addrnc (via @FrankStrovel)"
More ...
Close